RetroDaze
They call me
"The Rubber Duck".
"The Rubber Duck".
RETRORATING: 13
OFFICIAL
RETRORATING: 12
Forum Comments List
Displaying 17641-17650 of 49814 results.
| ID | Thread | Description | Posted By | Posted On | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33336 | How was your day? | A child has been reported missing due to the storm here. | Mr Magic | Jan 23, 2017 |  |
| 33335 | King Arthur: Legend of the Sword | Only King Arthur movie I'm familiar with is this one <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082348/">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082348/</a><br> | Linux_Sage | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33334 | Last Movie You Watched | Last movie I saw in the theaters was Passengers. It was OK. I like sci-fi movies but this one spent a bit too much time on the romance side of things. I was more curious to the world outside of that. Still enjoyable for the most part though<br> | Linux_Sage | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33333 | How was your day? | Yeah these storms are hammering the south all over. People are even dying. Really hope this stuff lets up soon. <br> | Linux_Sage | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33332 | Star Wars Episode 8 | That would be the appropriate time to show it. | Mr Magic | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33331 | Last Movie You Watched | The Rage: Carrie 2<div><br></div><div>Could've been better. The party scene was cool, though.</div><div><br></div><div>It's a movie that asks "Who are your real friends? Who do you trust?"</div><div><br></div><div>I'll have to give this a 2 1/2 star rating. Pretty bad sequel.</div> | Mr Magic | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33330 | Star Wars Episode 8 | Maybe a trailer will drop during the superbowl! | echidna64 | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33329 | Star Wars Episode 8 | Great. We won't have to wait another year for it to come out! <img src="http://retro-daze.org/images/smilies/MavSmile.gif"><div><br></div><div>When George Lucas was doing the Star Wars films, fans had to wait three years before a new film was released.</div> | Mr Magic | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33328 | Inauguration Day | Really? The protesters don't have a reason to march? They are just "bored" and decided to take a walk at the same time, on multiple continents, on the same day just by coincidence. That dismissive attitude is why they are protesting. Women have issues that are exclusive to them, their reproductive rights, and the health of their bodies, but lawmakers who don't have a basic understanding of the female body are able to pass legislation to cut funding for their health resources. Trump's pick for the Supreme Court could potentially overturn Roe v. Wade, which would punish women and not give them a choice over their bodies. You don't see the issue, but that doesn't mean they don't have one.<br><br>I doubt you guys spend money on tampons, pads, and hormonal birth control for yourselves every month, but women do. Does that mean feminine hygiene isn't an issue just because men don't have to buy those things? No. <br>Would I get a better understanding of the price, purpose, and actual use of those products by asking a man, or a woman?<br>Maybe I'm weird, but I'd say a woman knows better about their own bodies than a man. Now, imagine that man is like Trump and he wants to cut funding to free clinics and Planned Parenthood. He doesn't even need to set foot in one, know what it is or what they do, or know anything but the name. Is that good politics? Is that good for women who rely on them? What are the potential ripple effects that would cause? Can you say in good faith that Trump would actually do the appropriate research and verify facts before signing a bill into law or even tweeting something?<br>That is why women are protesting.<br><br>Trump's vitriol toward women during the campaign, amongst other groups, does not give women hope that they will have their issues addressed fairly, or at all. If any politician could pass legislation to strip away the bodily rights of women, it would be him. He flip-flops, lies, and lies about lying, but we're just supposed to trust him blindly? "Nothing we can do folks, he's in charge." Women are protesting because the First Amendment of the Constitution allows them to exercise that right. <br>Even Trump himself called for protests and a march to Washington during Obama's second inauguration. It's hilariously ironic that people are using his words against him. But he proved his words don't mean anything, his actions don't mean anything, and yet he somehow convinced a lot of his supporters that everyone is lying but him. That is dangerous for everyone. What if a bill he signs into law causes problems? Who will he shift the blame? Will he just say he never signed it and backpedal? I would not put that kind of act past him. He tried to weasel around during the election by saying it was rigged in case he lost, but he won. He is the President and has to be held accountable for his actions and words now. He can't pass the buck anymore, it has to stop here.<br><br>No one wants the country to fail, but he is the most disliked President for a reason. He earned this reaction during his campaign through his own actions. People are not happy. If women weren't protesting, people would say they didn't have any issues. Now that they are protesting, people dismiss and ignore their issues. What exactly do you want women to do?<br><br><br> | Ajimbo | Jan 23, 2017 | |
| 33327 | Inauguration Day | Sam Harris is a man I share very little with in terms of political, religious, and personal views. But in this video he pretty much nails the reasons why the Hildebeast lost the election:<br><br><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jA_AxTzBBvI" allowfullscreen="" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0"></iframe> | Vaporman87 | Jan 23, 2017 | |
